Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Stirling Online Research Repository. Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: Show full item record.
Anis, Radwa Magdy Mohamed. One of the main aims of the underlying research is to respond to continuous calls for introducing and measuring a sound economic definition for best practice disclosure /do-my-psychology-homework-please.html e.
It also aims to examine the impact of corporate dissertation corporate governance and disclosure quality on best practice disclosure quality. Finally, it aims to examine the joint effect of both best practice disclosure quality and corporate governance on firm value.
The dissertation corporate governance and disclosure quality contributes to disclosure studies in three principal ways. First, it introduces a new measure for best practice disclosure quality. Further disclosure quality show that the proposed measure is reliable and valid.
Second, it uses machine-readable OFR statements for financial years ending inand develops a language processing and disclosure quality through constructing dissertation corporate governance keyword lists.
Third, it examines the extent to which disclosure quantity provides a proper proxy for disclosure disclosure quality. The analysis shows dissertation corporate disclosure quantity is not a good proxy for disclosure quality. Accordingly, results derived, dissertation corporate governance and disclosure governance and quantity as a proxy for quality, are questionable.
Results of the association between disclosure quality and corporate governance mechanisms suggest that the most effective governance mechanisms in improving disclosure quality are dissertation corporate governance and disclosure quality structure, audit committee meeting frequency, and audit firm size. Using a wide set of corporate governance mechanisms, the study also contributes to three research strands and explains the inconclusive results in relation to the association between disclosure quality, corporate governance mechanisms and firm value.
It provides empirical evidence as to which governance mechanisms promote the quality of voluntarily disclosed information in large UK firms. Additionally, it provides empirical evidence as to the joint effect of best practice disclosure quality, corporate governance mechanisms on firm value in the UK.
Results also show that best practice disclosure quality enjoys a substitutive /dissertation-proof-reading-qualifications.html with two corporate governance and disclosure quality audit committee independence dissertation corporate governance and disclosure quality audit committee size and a complementary association with board independence in relation to firm value.
The study has various research and policy more info. It suggests new research avenues for re-examining disclosure relationships, especially research areas that do not have persuasive conclusions such as dissertation corporate governance and disclosure quality economic consequences of disclosure dissertation corporate governance and disclosure quality. Such research may inform both regulators and managers as to the costs and benefits of disclosure quality to both firms and stakeholders.
This item is protected by original copyright View License.
2018 ©