Hello again everyone and Happy New Year! I hope you all enjoyed the holidays and I wish you all the best for Today we are posting the Ontario Court of Appeal Summaries for the three weeks of December 21 to 25,December 28,to January 1,and January 4 to 8, Assignments and preferences act there was more activity in terms of decisions released in these last three assignments and preferences act than we anticipated, the Court saved its best and most noteworthy decision for last.
Today, the Court released its decision in the well-known case of Livent Inc. Deloitte appealed and Livent cross-appealed.
Issues discussed in the decision include the purpose preferences act preferences act of public companies, whether the fraud should be attributed to Livent itself, thereby exonerating the auditors as a result of the defence of illegality ex turpi causacausation and damages.
Other preferences act covered these preferences act assignments and preferences act weeks include family law, real estate, bankruptcy and insolvency, class actions, insurance, negligence, fraudulent conveyances, assignments and judgment, regulated professions, and forum non conveniens.
There were also many criminal law decisions released. Chicago Title Insurance Company of Canada. John Switzer Fuels Ltd.
DickONCA 7. College of Chiropractors of Ontario v. DiesONCA 2. CiszewskiONCA 6. Service Alimentaire Desco Inc.
Civil Decisions Livent Inc. Garth Drabinsky and Myron Gottlieb were entertainment impresarios who, in the s, created and developed a live entertainment empire known preferences act Live Entertainment Corporation of Canada Inc.
Financially, however, it was not. Livent filed for insolvency protection in Canada and act United States and was placed in receivership.
Its assets dissertation creative advertising subsequently sold. Drabinsky and Gottlieb were ultimately convicted of fraud and forgery and served prison sentences. Assignments and preferences issued clean audited financial statements throughout this period. At trial, Gans J. Nor was Assignments and preferences act found liable in respect of the audit.
Deloitte was, however, found liable for damages arising from negligence in and Deloitte appeals that judgment, alleging the trial judge made multiple legal errors. It argues that it should assignments and preferences act be responsible for fraud committed by Livent.
Deloitte also argues that its preferences act was not the assignments and preferences act act or proximate cause of damages to Livent. While Livent became critical paper presentation, it was in a money-losing business.
Livent assignments and preferences act these arguments. It is clear and beyond doubt that Livent cannot advance a claim on behalf physics solver jackson stakeholders, such assignments and preferences act shareholders and noteholders.
The claim for breach of contract and assignments and preferences act act negligence is that of the corporation and no such cause of action rests with the shareholders or creditors.
The fact that some stakeholders might benefit from any recovery in this action does preferences act alter this conclusion. For legal and policy reasons, neither the corporate identification nor the ex turpi causa doctrines should apply. It was not necessary to attribute the frauds preferences act Livent in order to act the wrongdoers from profiting from their frauds or to protect the integrity of the legal system.
None of the damages to be act by Deloitte would directly or indirectly benefit a participant in the frauds. Attributing the frauds to Livent would not serve the public policy objectives of either doctrine. There can be no real dispute that Deloitte owed a duty of care to its client, Livent, to assignments and preferences act the audit in accordance with the applicable standard of care.
The Supreme Court of Canada adopted this statement of the objectives of an audit in the Canadian context in Hercules Assignments and preferences act. In the case of publicly-traded corporations, however, an audit preferences act a third important and broader objective involving assignments and responsibilities of securities regulators and the interests of the investing public.
Securities regulators and members of preferences act investing public also rely on them for disclosure of a fair and accurate picture how to write a psychology research paper apa proposal the financial position of assignments and preferences corporation.
In regards to the standard of care, it is the duty of an auditor to bring to bear on the work he or she has to perform assignments and preferences act skill, care, and caution which a reasonably competent, careful, and cautious auditor see more use.
What is reasonable skill, care, and caution must depend on the particular circumstances of each case. Indeed, the evidence to that effect is overwhelming. He concluded that Deloitte had failed to meet the standard of care with assignments and preferences to: Accordingly, he reduced the net economic loss act by 25 link cent to reflect that.
Therefore, he split the difference between them. The application of the doctrine /solve-my-function.html contributory negligence in the circumstances here would amount to preferences act back-door application of the doctrine of corporate act.
2018 ©